Paul Howson’s Website: A Film Restoration Diary

Scanning and Restoring The Witness — Part 3

Mon, 19 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0000

With the scanning process complete, after two attempts to get a useable result from the available film materials, it was time to combine all the pieces. These were:

The scan of the intermediate negative (Roll 2), generated from the original Roll A, Roll B and Roll C.
The audio track from the 2007 Ursa scan.

Matching up the Pieces

The first step was to create a new Final Cut Pro project and import the required elements — the intermediate negative (Roll 2) and the audio track from the 2007 Ursa scan. Additionally I imported the original Roll A camera reversal scan on a separate timeline as a reference if required.

The Film: “Yoga And The Individual” from 1966

Fri, 29 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0000

In Melbourne, Australia, in the mid-1960s, the subject of Yoga was still a mystery to most people. If they had any concepts about it, these would probably have been stereotypes of weird bodily contortions or “standing on one’s head”.

It was Melbourne film maker John Murray who undertook to dispel some of these misconceptions by making a documentary film about the subject. The film is called “Yoga and the Individual” and it won a Silver Award at the 1966 Australian Film Institute awards.

Scanning and Restoring The Witness — Part 2

Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0000

In Part 1 of this article we established the starting materials available for restoring “The Witness”. The next step was to choose a restoration strategy.

Obviously it is desirable to work from materials which are as close as possible to the originals — on the assumption that these will be the highest quality available. In this case we did have the original camera reversal (Roll A), but it exhibited vinegar syndrome and visible shrinkage. The question was: could it be scanned and would it produce a useable result?

Scanning and Restoring The Witness — Part 1

Wed, 17 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0000

“The Witness” is a short, black and white film drama made at GTV9 circa 1960 by Denzil Howson and Mike Browning in which Denzil played two parts. You can read more about the making of the film in a post on the Denzil Howson Archive: The Witness — A Short Film by Denzil Howson and Mike Browning circa 1960.

Our focus here is the scanning and restoration of this short film, undertaken in 2019–2021. I will cover this in a series of blog posts.

Approaching the Soundtrack

Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0000

With the video file of Marianne stabilised, dust-busted and awaiting only level adjustments, it’s time to turn attention to the soundtrack and the improvements which can be made there.

An initial analysis of the soundtrack, scanned on a Spirit Datacine at Cutting Edge in Brisbane, was covered in an earlier post Assessing the Scans Part 4 — Soundtrack. In that post I noted the limited frequency range and the noise from film grain, dust, scratches and splices.

Dust-Busting with Loki

Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0000

The 1963 Tarax Show Christmas Pantomime, “Marianne” has been the focus of this blog for some time, especially the stabilisation process previously described.

The stabilisation and removal of jitter (present from the 16mm film recording plus more introduced during scanning) worked very well. But there was still the problem of dust and scratches.

Commercial semi-manual solutions are very expensive. Could there be there something more affordable? For a while it seemed not.

A Closer Look at the Golden Eye Scanner

Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0000

As mentioned in the previous post, I was at Cameraquip in South Melbourne talking with the proprietor, Malcolm Richards, about their Digital Vision Golden Eye 2 Scanner.

The Golden Eye is compact enough to sit on a desktop. Contrast this with the Spirit Datacine mentioned in an earlier post which is a large floor-standing device. The newer breed of film scanners, like the Golden Eye, seem to be getting smaller — viz. the aforementioned ScanStation, also a desktop device, and the Cintel Scanner from Blackmagic Design, which they claim can be hung on a wall like a painting!

An Introduction to Cameraquip and the Golden Eye Scanner

Wed, 26 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0000

In early 2018 I was contacted by a former viewer and one-time audience member of The Tarax Show, Rob Grant, who is Senior Video Producer at the Royal Children’s Hospital Creative Studio in Melbourne. He had stumbled across this Film Restoration Diary blog while researching scanning solutions for the hospital’s 16mm film archive.

I was able to visit Rob at the RCH and see first hand the diverse and important work done at the hospital’s Creative Studio. In preparation for the 150th anniversary in 2020, the Creative Studio had the task of creating displays chronicling the history of the hospital. This included scanning and digitising their collection of 16mm films which dated back to the 1940s.

Investigating Another Dust & Scratches Repair System

Fri, 31 May 2019 00:00:00 +0000

Always curious about film restoration software, the name Digital Vision appeared on my radar circa 2013. However I didn’t start looking at in detail until 2016.

Digital Vision are an English company. They make a suite of film restoration software under the name “Phoenix”. I sent an enquiry via their website and was in turn contacted by their Australian technical support person at the time, Felipe Muraca in Melbourne. Felipe advised me:

Situation Review After Two Years of Silence

Wed, 17 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0000

This blog has been silent for two years, but progress on this restoration project has been on-going, albeit with some significant pauses due to other demands on my time.

As of April 2017 we had reached a satisfying conclusion to the problem of stabilising the jitter in “Marianne”, the 1963 Tarax Show Christmas Pantomime which is the subject of my current focus.

For practical purposes the jitter was eliminated, but the problem of dust and scratches remained.

Home-Grown Jitter Stabilisation — Part 7 — The Stabilisation Works!

Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0000

Having spent the previous six posts explaining the jitter stabilisation process for the 1963 kine of Marianne, let’s take a look at how well it works.

So that you can see the jitter more clearly, I’ve prepared a 30 second sample video which shows a side-by-side, before-and-after comparison.

As explained earlier, this kine was scanned at 2K resolution, which is 2048 x 1556 pixels. The jitter detection and stabilisation was also done at this full resolution for maximum accuracy. However an entire 2K frame is far too large to show in this web page, so the sample video shows only the four corners of each frame. A 108 pixel by 108 pixel sample was taken from each of the four corners of each scanned frame and these have been put together into a composite image.

Home-Grown Jitter Stabilisation — Part 6 — A Stabilisation Workflow

Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0000

For those of you not completely bamboozled by this excursion into the very-technical, here is a summary of the whole stabilisation process developed for the Marianne kine scan.

Convert the 2K scanned video into a series of tif files, one file per frame. There are 79675 frames, the dimensions of each frame being 2018 x 1556 pixels.
Divide these frames into sequences roughly corresponding to scene changes in the production. Each sequence typically 5–10 minutes duration. Some very short sequences used for fixing “splice bumps”.
Use this author’s custom software to analyse the frames and find an optimum reference frame for each sequence. This is one where the displacement of the frame is closest to the median (i.e. most common) value — i.e. it’s a “middle of the road” frame with respect to jitter.
The software compares each frame in the sequence with the reference frame, uses image correlation to determine the corner dot movements and calculates the displacement, rotation and vertical scaling of each frame relative to the reference frame.
An image transform is then used to reverse these distortions, thus cancelling out the jitter (not perfectly but almost). At the same time each frame is reduced in size from 2K (i.e 2048 x 1556 pixels) to PAL SD+ (720 x 576 pixels plus overscan).
The resulting corrected and downsampled frame images are saved to disk and then re-combined into a “stabilised” video file at PAL SD+ resolution.

That’s it in a nutshell, although in practice there were many technical challenges to overcome in making this work and the whole exercise ended up taking many months of part-time work — as usual with these things more than I initially expected!

Home-Grown Jitter Stabilisation — Part 5 — Odds and Ends

Mon, 20 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0000

In this post we look at a few odds and ends that arose during the stabilisation exercise: Dealing with frame defects and splice bumps, adding frame numbers, and re-combining frames into a video file.

Dealing with Frame Defects

An unexpected challenge which arose when stabilising the thousands of frames in each sequence, was that some frames had defects which obscured one or more white corner dots and made it impossible to measure the movement of these corner dots.

Home-Grown Jitter Stabilisation — Part 4 — A Bit of Geometry and Maths

Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0000

The last post described using image correlation to measure the motion of the white dots in each of the four frame corners. These white dots move together with the video raster. Stabilising the white dots will stabilise the unwanted movement or jitter of the video raster.

The following graphic used in an earlier post demonstrates again the three kinds of motion and the red arrows show the corresponding offsets of the corner dots.

Home-Grown Jitter Stabilisation — Part 3 — Image Correlation to Detect Movements

Thu, 02 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0000

In the last couple of posts dealing with “Home-Grown Jitter Stabilisation”, we established:

The jitter comprises displacement, rotation and vertical scaling.
There is a white dot (partially) visible in each of the four corners of each scanned film frame. These dots move together with the video raster.
If we can measure the frame-to-frame movement of these dots, we can calculate and then correct (i.e. remove) the jitter.

So now we come to the topic of how to measure the frame-to-frame movement of these white dots.

Home-Grown Jitter Stabilisation — Part 2 — Three Kinds of Motion

Wed, 07 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0000

Let’s put some visuals to this idea of stabilising the jitter in the kine scans.

As I mentioned in the last post, the jitter actually comprises three kinds of motion:

Displacement
Rotation
Vertical stretch

The following three diagrams illustrate each kind of motion. To make them clearly visible, the movements in these illustrations are proportionally much larger than in the actual film frames.

For each kind of motion, the little red arrows show the resulting movements of each corner artefact — the white dots which are stable relative to the video raster.

Home-Grown Jitter Stabilisation — Part 1 — Could it be Done?

Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0000

As mentioned in the previous post, Promoscape had been unable to deal with the jitter: “With regard to stabilisation, we can’t find a cost effective and consistent way to achieve this with the footage.”

They explained that the jitter was not just horizontal and vertical movement (displacement) but included rotation as well.

I’ve talked about possible sources of this jitter in the post Assessing the Scans Part 2 — Jitter. There are a number of possible contributors to the jitter seen in the scans. Here again is the sample of 50 frames from Marianne (1963):

More Digital Restoration Tests with Promoscape in Melbourne

Fri, 14 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0000

Twice before we’ve looked at digital restoration options:

Exploring the Possibilities of Digital Restoration: Shows a digital restoration test of some Tarax Show kine footage done by Lowry Digital Imaging in Burbank, California.
Experiments in Digital Restoration with PFClean: Covers my own experiments with PFClean from The Pixel Farm in the UK.

Each of these tests produced promising results, but the cost of a full-length restoration was prohibitive.

Were there any other options? A bit of digging turned up another software product — “Diamant” from HS-Art in Austria — more or less the European alternative to PFClean. That led me to Promoscape in Melbourne, who were providing digital film restoration services using Diamant.

Adjusting Framing and Levels in Final Cut Pro

Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0000

In the previous post we established the downsampling ratio for the 2K scans of “Marianne” (1963) which would result in a PAL SD frame — after cropping off the overscan.

Downsampling the 2K Scan

Why downsample the video at this stage rather than doing positional adjustments, grading and repairs at 2K resolution? The fact is, there’s not really any benefit in retaining all that resolution when the original analog video raster recorded to film had a resolution of roughly 300 lines vertically by perhaps 500 lines horizontally (see earlier posts for a more detailed discussion of this). And working with 2K scans does slow things down, even with a very fast modern computer and an external Thunderbolt hard drive.

Finding the Smallest Video Raster Crop Size for Downsampling Calculations

Wed, 15 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0000

In the earlier post[1] about downsampling the kine scans from 2K to “PAL SD+”, we established the need to know the minimum dimensions of the video raster, which varies slightly in width and height over the duration of a reel. The final cropping boundary for a PAL SD video needs to fall within the minimum video raster size so that we get nice clean edges on the video frames.

This required scrubbing through the 2K scan and measuring the video raster dimensions at the locations where the raster seems to have a noticeably smaller size. The following table contains some measurements for “Marianne” (1963):

Where Have We Been and What’s Next?

Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0000

Wow, we’re up to the 23rd post in this blog series on restoring the Tarax Show Christmas Pantomime kines. Let’s take a breather and review where we’ve been so far and then map out the next steps.

Where We’ve Been So Far

Here is a chronological list of the posts so far, grouped under headings. Each title is linked to its post (in case you want to go back and read any you missed).

The Relevance of Pixel Aspect Ratio

Tue, 29 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0000

Congratulations if you got through the previous rather technical post about Pixel Aspect Ratio.

The next question is: how does this Pixel Aspect Ratio business affect the process of preparing these kine scans for DVD release?

Pixels Are Inherently Shapeless

When stored in a digital file on disk or DVD, a video frame is just a series of numbers, where each number (or set of numbers) describes the brightness and/or colour values of a pixel — a video frame being a 2-dimensional array of pixels.

The Mysteries of Pixel Aspect Ratio

Wed, 02 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0000

I mentioned in the previous post that we would talk about Pixel Aspect Ratio (PAR). In this post we’ll talk about the historical background and in the next post we’ll look at how it affects video downsampling for this project.

Wikipedia provides a good introduction to PAR:

Most digital imaging systems display an image as a grid of tiny, square pixels. However, some imaging systems, especially those that must be compatible with standard-definition television motion pictures, display an image as a grid of rectangular pixels, in which the pixel width and height are different. Pixel Aspect Ratio describes this difference.

The Mathematics of Downsampling the High Definition Scans for PAL SD

Thu, 21 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0000

In the previous post we established the need to downsample the high resolution 2K scans to a lower resolution for PAL SD release. We need to adjust this downsampling so that:

The overscan (i.e. the area of the film frame beyond the boundaries of the video raster) is preserved.
The dimensions of the video raster (after downsampling) are slightly larger than the PAL SD frame size of 720 x 576 pixels. This will allow final cropping to remove a little “bleed” around the edges of the video raster to produce a PAL SD frame in which the video raster (i.e. the original television image) neatly fills the frame.

Preserving the overscan implies that the downsampled video will have a larger frame size than PAL SD — in fact a non standard frame size which we will refer to as PAL SD+.

Editing Tools, Grading and When to Downsample

Thu, 12 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0000

As I write this blog post (November 2015), I’m still covering work done a year or more ago. At the time I didn’t think to write about it. Looking back though it seemed an interesting journey.

So let’s see, we’ve covered preparatory work before scanning, various attempts and experiences with scanning the kines, some more successful than others, an analysis of the scans and some experiments with digital restoration.

Choosing a Tool for Grading the Scans

For DVD or internet release the scans will need “grading” (adjustment of grey levels), adjustment of positional errors (explained below) and the odd bit of editing and frame repair. That means a digital editing tool, and the obvious choice was Final Cut Pro X (FCPX) from Apple.

Experiments in Digital Restoration with PFClean

Wed, 09 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0000

Some years ago there was a television series called “The Second World War in Colour”. It featured seldom seen colour film footage taken during the war. In the introduction to the accompanying book (of colour photographs) the author remarks that there is a widespread and unconscious perception that “…the war was fought in black and white” — a result of the fact that most of the historical newsreel footage and photographs are in black and white.

Mapping out a Restoration Roadmap

Mon, 17 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0000

Having assessed the four Tarax Show Christmas Pantomime kine scans, it is time to plan out a restoration roadmap.

Restoration Steps

The steps now required to restore these scans ready for release on DVD are (not necessarily in this order):

Stabilisation of jitter if possible and practical. Tests have shown jitter can be most accurately measured and corrected at high resolution.
Downsampling of the scanned frames to PAL SD+ resolution — this means PAL SD resolution (720 x 576 pixels) plus allowance for the overscan.
Grading of the video levels so that white peaks and shadow detail are not clipped — i.e not too much contrast. At the same time, we don’t want the result to be “flat”. We want want to utilise the full “broadcast safe” tonal range.
Reduction of film artefacts: dust and scratches if possible and practical.
Cropping to PAL SD resolution which is required for DVD release.
Repair and equalisation of the soundtrack.
Mastering for DVD or release on the web.

In the next post, we’ll try out some commercial film restoration software and see how good a job it does at stabilisation and dust and scratch removal.

Re-Scanning The Golden Princess (1962)

Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0000

In the previous four posts, we assessed four aspects of the Tarax Show Christmas Pantomime kine scans:

Anatomy of a Kine Frame
Jitter
Video Levels
Soundtrack

The most significant problems were jitter and dust and scratches. We will look at ways to reduce the effect of these in later blog posts.

However, the scan of The Golden Princess done on the Spirit Datacine suffers rather badly from some of the defects to which “line scanners” like the Spirit are susceptible.

Assessing the Scans Part 4 — Soundtrack

Tue, 14 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0000

In assessing these kine scans we come finally and briefly to the sound tracks. Each kine has an optical soundtrack, some are variable area, others variable density.

Optical soundtracks on 16mm film are not exactly “high fidelity” audio. The two most significant limitations on quality are:

The frequency range. The soundtrack is recorded linearly along the edge of the film. The limitation on frequency response is the shortest wavelength which can be recorded and reproduced. When playing back an optical soundtrack on a traditional projector, the soundtrack passes over a very fine slit with a light source behind it. A detector on the other side of the film picks up the fluctuations in light intensity. The width of this slit determines the shortest wavelength which can be reproduced. It is generally accepted that 16mm optical soundtracks can reproduce frequencies up to about 6kHz.
Film grain, dust, etc. With the audio signal effectively being recorded onto and reproduced from a very thin slice of the film, film grain becomes a source of noise. Dust and scratches cause audible clicks, pops and dropouts. Hence optical soundtracks have a poor signal to noise ratio.

Given these limitations, the soundtracks on these kines are not too bad. The scans made on the Spirit Datacine need some equalisation to boost the high frequencies in the 2kHz to 6kHz range.

Assessing the Scans Part 3 — Video Levels

Wed, 24 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0000

This post discusses video levels in the four kine scans. For the purposes of this discussion, we will talk about luminance values only since the Tarax Show scans are black and white and the colour information has been removed from the scans.

First, let’s look at a screenshot of a “video scope” and the corresponding frame, as displayed in Final Cut Pro.

A frame from one of the kine scans together with a video scope display that plots the luminance values in each scan line.

This kind of display has been around since the very early days of television — engineers used them to adjust camera video levels to ensure they fell within the required broadcast-safe range. In those days it would have been a CRT screen displaying analog voltages representing video levels.

Assessing the Scans Part 2 — Jitter

Tue, 26 May 2015 00:00:00 +0000

What I’m calling “jitter” is unwanted rapid small movements of the video image vertically and horizontally caused by the mechanical processes of recording to and reproducing from film.

By scanning an area of the kine film frame beyond the edges of the video raster, one can get some insights into the sources of jitter.

Jitter on the Spirit Datacine

The Spirit Datacine seems to be particularly susceptible to jitter. It scans the film while it is moving using a “line scanner” and attempts to detect the location of each frame by sensing the position of the sprocket holes. This mechanical sprocket hole detection is not perfect and small positional errors can occur in the direction of film motion. This is one cause of vertical jitter.

Assessing the Scans Part 1 — Anatomy of a Kine Frame

Thu, 14 May 2015 00:00:00 +0000

With four scans under our belt, let’s take a look at them in more detail as an aid to planning how best to restore them for DVD release.

The first thing to note is that all four scans have “2K” resolution — 2048 pixels wide by 1556 pixels high. That’s a lot more resolution than is needed to reproduce the detail on the film.

As explained in an earlier post¹:

Dealing with the Vinegar Syndrome Reel

Mon, 20 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0000

As I mentioned in the previous post, one kine reel had a noticeable “vinegar syndrome” smell. The Australian National Film and Sound Archive describes the problem:

“Vinegar syndrome is a term used to describe the chemical reaction that goes on during the deterioration of cellulose triacetate film support. The presence of the odour does not mean the film has degraded, but rather that the reaction is taking place.”

Vinegar syndrome causes shrinkage of the film base — this appears to have happened to the 1959 kine of “Merry Make-Believe”. The shrinkage had also caused the film to twist. Shrinkage was the most likely reason it would not play on a 16mm projector without constantly losing registration with the pull-down claw.

Collecting and Inspecting the 2K Scans at Cutting Edge

Tue, 07 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0000

It was with excited anticipation that I returned again to Cutting Edge to see first hand the high resolution scans of the Tarax Show kines. With high quality, high resolution scans from the film, the project to restore these productions for DVD release could now move forward.

Justin had scanned all the reels sent, except for “Merry Make Believe” (1959), which was warping and jumping off the Spirit Datacine motion-sensing sprocket and losing registration. This reel had noticeable “vinegar syndrome” — a form of chemical degradation that affects acetate film bases and causes the material to shrink and warp. I would need to find another scanning solution for that reel (more about that in a later post).

Preparing the Films for Scanning on the Spirit

Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0000

Having found a Spirit Datacine in Brisbane and tested some of the Tarax Show kines, it was time to prepare the full length 16mm reels for scanning.

Of the five Tarax Show Christmas Pantomimes that I had fully on film, I chose four for scanning: 1959, 1961, 1962 and 1963.

In addition to the full reels, there were some cans marked “offcuts” which suggested that pieces had been excised for use in the “Magic Box” show about early television which Denzil Howson presented in his later years.

Cutting Edge Brisbane to the Rescue with a Spirit Datacine

Mon, 16 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0000

The discovery of a Spirit Datacine at Cutting Edge in Brisbane, only two hours away, was a relief after the at-a-distance negative experience with the Sydney company. This time I could see the equipment for myself, and discuss in person what was needed.

So in March 2013 I arranged to visit Justin at Cutting Edge, to see the Spirit machine up close, and to discuss the process for having films scanned.

Seeking Telecine Services in a Post-Film Era

Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0000

When the Sydney telecine company failed to deliver a useable scan, the search was on again for a quality film scanning service.

I called The Post Lounge again. They told me they were closing their Gold Coast facility and not running the Spirit Datacine anymore. They were planning to sell it. Apparently there was very little production happening at the Gold Coast and future productions would probably be all-digital, without using any film at all. The bottom line was: they were out of the film and telecine business.

Troubles in Telecine Land — A Lesson in Not Believing Advertising Hype

Mon, 22 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0000

It was not until 2012 that I was able to find time to arrange telecine transfers of the full length reels of the Tarax Show pantomimes.

However, things had changed drastically in telecine land since the Spirit Datacine test done by Larry at The Post Lounge in 2008.

Firstly, Larry had departed some years earlier and had not been replaced by another full-time telecine operator. The Post Lounge were now operating their Spirit Datacine on an as-needed basis using staff from their Brisbane office.

Exploring the Possibilities of Digital Restoration

Thu, 27 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0000

The black and white television equipment installed at GTV9 in the late 1950s delivered remarkably good picture quality. This was especially so within the studio complex itself where the engineers maintained the equipment to a high standard and sought the best possible picture quality.

Before the arrival of videotape in 1959, making “kines” to 16mm film was the only way of preserving a broadcast. The use of film as an archival and/or distribution medium continued well into the 1960s.

Telecine — Initial Experiments and the Spirit Datacine

Tue, 09 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0000

Around the same time as Studio One at GTV9 was transformed into Toyland for the last Tarax Show Christmas Pantomime, the BBC in London was getting ready to launch a new childrens’ television series about a curious character who travels through time and space in a police telephone box. Dr Who was also (mainly) a studio-based production, recorded to videotape and subsequently copied to film for distribution to television stations around the world.

About the GTV9 Film Recording System Circa 1960

Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0000

In this post we’re going to get a bit more technical and look into how these film copies (“kines”) were made from the original television productions. We’re going to delve into some technical history of film recordings at GTV9 circa 1960.

I would like to acknowledge the assistance of former GTV9 engineers Ian Douglas and Andrew McKean in providing technical details of the film recording system.

Technical Parameters of the Australian Television System Circa 1960

The Australian black and white television system circa 1960 delivered 25 television “frames” per second. Each television frame had 625 scan lines. These 625 scan lines were split between two “fields”, with two successive fields making up each frame (hence 50 fields per second). Consequently each field contained only half of the 625 scan lines for each frame — i.e. around 300 scan lines per field. The relevance of this will become clear in a moment.

Compiling a List of Films and Their Condition

Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0000

In the previous post I gave a brief history of the Happy/Tarax Show annual Christmas Pantomimes. The surviving film copies of these are the subject of this current restoration project.

Each one of the seven Christmas Pantomimes produced annually between 1957 and 1963 was recorded onto 16mm film. The resulting film copy is known as a “kinescope” or “kine”.

For the 1957 and 1958 productions, recording to film was done at the time of live broadcast. With the coming of videotape circa 1959, it became possible to pre-record programs for subsequent broadcast, and the later film recordings of the Pantomimes were made from videotape.

Preserving and Restoring the Tarax Show Christmas Pantomimes

Thu, 05 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0000

In 1956 the Olympic Games ushered Melbourne into the television era. My father (Denzil Howson) had joined GTV9 as Assistant Programme Manager in September that year and we were one of the rare households in those early days with a TV set. It was an American “Admiral” set and it cost a lot of money. The Happy Show premiered on 19th January 1957 — just two days after GTV9 began regular transmissions.

About this Film Restoration Diary

Wed, 01 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0000

Having grown up in a family where filmmaking and film technology were a regular presence, I absorbed an interest in filmmaking and the technology of film at an early age.

After working for many years in the field of graphic design and later web design, I inherited a collection of films made by my late father, some of which are of historical significance, in particular those dating from his work in the early days of Australian television circa 1956 to 1963.